@font-face {
font-family: Cambria Math;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; }
P.MsoNormal {
MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; FONT-SIZE: 12pt
}
LI.MsoNormal {
MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; FONT-SIZE: 12pt
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; FONT-SIZE: 12pt
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
P {
FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto
}
SPAN.EmailStyle18 {
TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; FONT-VARIANT: normal !important; FONT-FAMILY: "Arial","sans-serif"; COLOR: windowtext; VERTICAL-ALIGN: baseline; TEXT-DECORATION: none; mso-style-type: personal-reply; text-shadow: none
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
Maybe someone can explain this to me, how can the EPA not
agree with the recommendation of the EPA?
See the quote below.
Some of EPAs voluntary programs are not achieving the air
quality goals they were created to achieve. For example, since 1988 when the
Indoor Radon Abatement Act was enacted with the goal that indoor air should be
as free of radon as outdoor air, EPA has administered a voluntary program to
reduce indoor radon.64
However, inconsistencies in radon-related requirements among State
and local governments, a lack of incentives, funding constraints, and misuse of
the radon map limit EPAs ability to achieve greater results with this voluntary
program. The problem of radon exposure actually worsens each year. To date, EPA
has neither proposed any indoor radon regulations, nor decided how to use the
authorities and tools available to it to achieve Indoor Radon Abatement Act
goals. EPA did not agree with our recommendation to notify Congress of any
limitations in the Acts authorities authorized by Congress, as well as other
limitations that would preclude EPA from achieving the long-term goal of the
Act.
John
Mallon
----- Original Message -----
From:
Field, R
W
To: RADONPROFESSIONALS@LIST.UIOWA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 12:08
PM
Subject: [RNPROF] EPA's Key Management
Challenges for Fiscal Year 2009
"EPA's Key Management Challenges for Fiscal Year 2009," http://www.epa.gov/oig/reports/2009/FiscalYear2009MgmtChallenges.pdf
RN
PROF (Subscription changes - archives) - http://list.uiowa.edu/archives/radonprofessionals.html
***** RN LEADERS - http://www.radonleaders.org/ **** RN
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com
(Search radon)
No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.34/2122 - Release
Date: 05/19/09 06:21:00
RN PROF (Subscription changes - archives) - http://list.uiowa.edu/archives/radonprofessionals.html ***** RN LEADERS - http://www.radonleaders.org/ **** RN Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com (Search radon)
From Name
John Mallon
From Address
john@RADONDETECTIONANDCONTROL.COM